I think you will find that naming people on a public forum in a derogatory way and throwing wild accusations around without any substance is not a good idea for the forum owners. They can be classed as liable (so I'm led to believe) and as such the thread should have been removed. I read it and thought it was bang out of order, its not freedom of speech that suffers its the other users of the forum who may suffer as stricter controls may be thrust upon us. This isn't a bad forum but its been getting slowly worse as people for some reason or another think they should be told everything that goes on and stupid rumour after stupid rumour tends to clog up what can be a good source of information if used correctly. Why people believe they have a right to confidential information is beyond me, oh I know, its the old I go down every other week pay ?12 abuse they players if they don't perform outstandingly all the time, so I have a right, wrong. Get a grip on reality and let the people who put us into a position that was certainly unthinkable 10 years ago carry on how they see fit. Not throw wild rumours about that quite frankly don't deserve a reply.
And exactly which wild rumours are we on about.
The return of Keith Nelson FACT and has been discussed between certain directors!!
The slagging off of the coach by 2 directors ( whom i did not name ) FACT and a room full of Haven supporters were there to witness it.
The split between the board FACT Des admitted this in his radio interview.
The 4 waiting in the wings with ideas to come on board FACT
So unless i have missed something, no one has been named, no one as been slandered, so what is the issue.
Check out the Chelsea message board tonight, their fans who pay the wages are expressing their opinions freely
And for you to say, just let them carry on how they See fit beggars belief. If your kid was not pulling is weight at school but know he could do better would you let him carry on??
Other clubs are laughing at us and cannot believe we have got rid of DR.
Can all of us be wrong and a minority of 3 be so right??? you decide.